"Non-interventionism or non-intervention is a political philosophy or national foreign policy doctrine that opposes interference in the domestic politics and affairs of other countries..."
A policy that opposes interference in the affairs of other countries, even in cases of human rights violations or other crises.
Isolationism: This refers to the policy of avoiding alliances and involvement in the affairs of other countries to maintain neutrality and avoid conflicts.
Neutrality: This refers to the policy of not taking sides in conflicts between other countries and remaining impartial.
Non-intervention: This refers to the policy of abstaining from using military or economic power to interfere with the internal affairs of other nations.
Non-aggression: This refers to the policy of refraining from initiating an attack or declaring war on other nations or territories.
Non-interference: This refers to the policy of respecting the sovereignty and independence of other nations and refraining from meddling in their internal affairs.
Historical Examples: Examples of non-interventionist foreign policies throughout history, including the Monroe Doctrine, the Washington Treaty, and the neutrality acts of the 1930s.
Pros and Cons: The advantages and disadvantages of non-interventionist foreign policy, including its potential to prevent war, maintain peace, and preserve national sovereignty, and also its potential to isolate the country, limit economic growth and ignore humanitarian crises.
Foreign Aid: The role of foreign aid in non-interventionist foreign policy, including the potential benefits of aid in promoting economic stability and democracy, and also the potential for aid to fuel corruption and dependency.
Diplomacy: The role of diplomacy in non-interventionist foreign policy, including the use of diplomacy to resolve conflicts and promote trade and development.
International Organizations: The role of international organizations, including the UN, in non-interventionist foreign policy, including the use of UN resolutions to prevent conflict and protect human rights.
National Security: The role of national security considerations in determining foreign policy, including the potential risks of non-interventionism in facing new security challenges.
Economic Sanctions: The use of economic sanctions as a tool of non-interventionist foreign policy, including the potential benefits of sanctions in promoting democracy and human rights, and also the drawbacks of sanctions in harming innocent civilians and undermining global economic stability.
Humanitarian Intervention: The debate surrounding the use of military force to prevent humanitarian crises, including the potential benefits and drawbacks of interventionist versus non-interventionist approaches.
Globalization: The role of globalization in shaping non-interventionist foreign policy, including the potential benefits of economic interdependence in promoting peace and stability, and also the potential downsides of globalization in exacerbating inequality and undermining national sovereignty.
International Law: The role of international law in guiding non-interventionist foreign policy, including the potential benefits of adherence to international law in promoting peace and stability, and also the potential drawbacks in undermining national sovereignty and independence.
Isolationism: This is a foreign policy approach that aims to avoid any kind of involvement with the international community. The focus is solely on national interests, and avoiding any kind of international commitments, alliances, or agreements.
Neo-Isolationism: This is a modernized version of isolationism that acknowledges the importance of global issues while still advocating for minimal engagement in international affairs.
Unilateralism: This policy approach involves pursuing national interests without considering the views or interests of other nations. A country with this foreign policy will act independently, without seeking agreement or cooperation from other countries.
Bilateralism: This policy approach involves a focus on two countries forging mutual agreements regarding trade, defense, or other issues. It usually involves negotiations and compromises that work in favor of both countries.
Multilateralism: This policy approach involves several nations working together to find solutions to global problems, such as climate change, trade, or security. This approach involves the negotiation of multilateral agreements and treaties among several countries.
Non-Alignment: This policy approach involves maintaining neutrality in global affairs and avoiding association with any world power or bloc. A non-aligned country may have friendly relations with many countries and avoid taking sides in conflicts.
Neutrality: This policy approach involves a country remaining neutral in times of conflict between other nations. A neutral country may not take sides in a conflict, but it may still help to mediate a solution for peaceful resolution.
Selective engagement: This policy approach involves choosing which issues to engage in according to a country's specific interests. A country with this foreign policy may selectively engage on key issues while avoiding involvement on others. It may also involve alliances with key strategic partners.
Offshore balancing: This policy approach involves relying on other states to contain potential threats to national security. A country with this foreign policy may attempt to balance power in their area by supporting weaker states with the potential to offset regional powers.
Restraint: This policy approach involves minimizing the use of military force and avoiding involvement in large foreign entanglements. A country with this foreign policy may engage in diplomacy, economic aid, and other forms of non-violent engagement to reduce tensions or resolve conflicts.
"...but, in contrast to isolationism, is not necessarily opposed to international commitments in general."
"A 1915 definition is that non-interventionism is a policy characterized by the absence of 'interference by a state or states in the external affairs of another state without its consent, or in its internal affairs with or without its consent'."
"This is based on the grounds that a state should not interfere in the internal politics of another state as well as the principles of state sovereignty and self-determination."
"A similar phrase is 'strategic independence'."
"...opposes interference in the domestic politics and affairs of other countries..."
"...is not necessarily opposed to international commitments in general."
"This is based on the grounds that a state should not interfere in the internal politics of another state as well as the principles of state sovereignty..."
"...the principles of state sovereignty and self-determination."
"...absence of 'interference by a state or states in the external affairs of another state without its consent..."
"...interference by a state or states...in its internal affairs with or without its consent."
"...opposes interference in the domestic politics and affairs of other countries..."
"...is not necessarily opposed to international commitments in general."
"...based on the grounds that a state should not interfere in the internal politics of another state..."
"...state sovereignty and self-determination."
"...in the external affairs of another state without its consent..."
"...in its internal affairs with or without its consent."
"A similar phrase is 'strategic independence'."
"...opposes interference in...the affairs of other countries..."
"...principles of state sovereignty and self-determination."