- "Judicial review is a process under which executive, legislative and administrative actions are subject to review by the judiciary."
The power of the Supreme Court to declare laws and actions of the government unconstitutional, and strike them down as invalid.
Introduction to Judicial Review: A general overview of the concept.
Constitutional Interpretation: The principles used to interpret the Constitution, including textualism, originalism, and living constitutionalism.
The Scope of Judicial Review: The range of issues that courts can review, including the justiciability doctrine and the political question doctrine.
Separation of Powers: The allocation of powers between the three branches of government and how this affects the judiciary's role in reviewing actions of the other branches.
Standing: The requirement that individuals or entities have a sufficient connection to a case to bring or participate in a legal action.
Deference to Agencies: A discussion of the level of deference courts should give to decisions made by government agencies.
Procedural Due Process: The right of individuals to receive a fair process in legal proceedings.
Substantive Due Process: A discussion of the idea that certain fundamental rights are protected by the Constitution and cannot be violated by government action.
Equal Protection: The principle that all people must be treated equally by the government.
Constitutional Remedies: The types of relief available to individuals whose rights have been violated, including injunctions and damages.
Jurisdiction: The power of a court to hear and decide a particular case.
The Role of Precedent: Discussion of how past court decisions influence current judicial review.
The Role of Judicial Activism: A debate over the extent to which courts should take an active role in shaping public policy.
Constitutional Crisis: Discussion of the hypothetical scenario where the Constitution isn't clear on an issue and the judiciary is called on to interpret it.
Review for Constitutionality: This is a type of judicial review that ensures that laws and policies are in compliance with the constitution.
Review for Procedural Impropriety: This type of judicial review ensures that proper procedures have been followed in making a decision or judgment.
Review for Substantive Impropriety: This type of judicial review ensures that the decision or judgment made was based on proper and relevant considerations.
Review for Proportionality: This type of judicial review examines whether the decision or judgment made was proportionate to the issue or problem at hand.
Review for Rationality: This type of judicial review ensures that the decision or judgment made was based on logical and rational reasoning.
Review for Abuses of Discretion: This type of judicial review ensures that the decision or judgment made was not arbitrary or capricious.
Review for Reasonableness: This type of judicial review examines whether the decision or judgment made was reasonable in light of the facts and circumstances involved.
Review for Error of Law: This type of judicial review examines whether the decision or judgment made was based on an error of law.
Review for Unreasonableness: This type of judicial review examines whether the decision or judgment made was unreasonable in light of the facts and circumstances involved.
Review for Constitutional Compliance: This type of judicial review ensures that the decision or judgment made is in compliance with relevant constitutional provisions.
Review for Deference: This type of judicial review examines whether the decision or judgment made should be given deference based on the expertise or discretion of the decision-maker.
- "A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws, acts and governmental actions."
- "A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws, acts and governmental actions."
- "An executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful."
- "A statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution."
- "Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers."
- "The power of the judiciary to supervise the legislative and executive branches."
- "When the latter exceed their authority."
- "The doctrine varies between jurisdictions."
- "The procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between and within countries."
- "Executive, legislative and administrative actions."
- "Executive and legislative branches."
- "The power of the judiciary to supervise the legislative and executive branches."
- "Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers."
- "The power of the judiciary to supervise the legislative and executive branches."
- "An executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful."
- "A statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution."
- "Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers."
- "The procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between and within countries."
- "The doctrine varies between jurisdictions."